On 28. 07. 2012 23:26, Bert Vermeulen wrote: > We simply have not had a proper look at it yet. I know it's been > ages, but we're currently very busy with a ton of other > sigrok-related things (see > https://github.com/biot/sigrok/commits/scan) and this just kind of > got lost.
Hi Bert Thank you very much for your kind reply and your work on Sigrok. I saw there's a ton of work being done and I think you are all doing a wonderful job with it. Sigrok has been a very useful for me, especially in the past few weeks when it turned out that it can decode UART signals, which is something our lab's expensive Tektronix logic analyzer just can't do :) Next time I'll have a patch I'll make sure to poke someone on the IRC. > I think you forgot to include your changes to libsigrok.h, but I > figured it out. Sorry about that. I didn't notice that at the time I was making my patch sigrok.h was generated from sigrok.h.in, so my changes got ignored by git. Best regards Tomaž ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
