Hi,
On Do, 2014-01-16 at 11:53 +0200, M.Emrah OZKAYA wrote:
> Hello, have you had any chance to look at the data I sent? Is it
> useful, do you need anything else? Thanks.
OK, I have had a look now. I have begun to document what I was able to
glean from the USB captures you and Uwe Hermann (who happens to own an
LWLA1016, too) provided:
http://sigrok.org/wiki/Sysclk_LWLA1016/Protocol
So far, so good -- the basics of the protocol are the same as for the
LWLA1034. However, the device operations like capture setup, status
polling and reading from memory are performed in a different (more
basic) manner. The LWLA1034 has dedicated commands for these, which the
LWLA1016 apparently lacks.
I fear it will be somewhat tedious to exchange protocol dumps by mail
which exercise all of the device functionality, and relate register
values to settings and displayed results in the vendor UI with
sufficient confidence. With the LWLA1034, I sometimes had to run
several live sessions in a row to test a single hypothesis about some
value the protocol.
Perhaps Uwe will be able to help.
Regards,
--Daniel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
sigrok-devel mailing list
sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
