On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Damir Jelić wrote: > Could you explain a little bit further in the commit message why > this is needed, recently there was an librevisa scpi backend added, > doesn't the librevisa backend offer everything an libusb backend > would offer?
librevisa offers even more... It offers a dependency on a one developper C++ lib which has no release yet, and which is probably not packaged by any linux distro or BSD flavor... I'm not saying librevisa is useless, or that we shouldn't support it. It just think it is really worth having a portable usbtmc implementation without additional dependency. > I currently have no way to test this so I didn't do a full review of > this either. Hopefully someone else can step in. OK. Aurel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
