That seems quite fine, though having a
using boost::none; at the start of the fole would make the constructor a bit
tidier, but that's a very minor point.
Jowl
On 12 May 2015 21:49:19 BST, Uffe Jakobsen <u...@uffe.org> wrote:
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Retransmit:
>About a week ago I posted this patch for pulseview during a
>conversation
>on IRC:
>
>[PATCH] pulseview: Fix for no matching function call error in
>pulseview/pv/binding/inputoutput.cpp:84
>
>https://github.com/uffejakobsen/pulseview/commit/3aa664c502c0a17848834b42249d729e218bdde4
>
>/Uffe
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>One dashboard for servers and applications across
>Physical-Virtual-Cloud
>Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
>Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable
>Insights
>Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
>http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
>_______________________________________________
>sigrok-devel mailing list
>sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
>
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
sigrok-devel mailing list
sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
