Hi Uwe, Thank you for merging my patch. I'm using a DSO-2090. Bug 464 is a different issue I didn't run into yet. I've seen this bug when doing research about the issue I run into and are pretty sure it's allready fixed by commit 7bb0fbf4d3809dbbd0fe5b35fc7e475b1065ae20 on Nov.03/2015 contributed by Martin Ling:
https://github.com/ntruchsess/pulseview/commit/7bb0fbf4d3809dbbd0fe5b35 fc7e475b1065ae20#diff-76d7888539cc887f7408f0d226526c71R272 regards, Norbert Am Montag, den 14.03.2016, 17:29 +0100 schrieb Uwe Hermann: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:10:12PM +0100, Norbert Truchsess wrote: > > hantek-dso offers configuration-option SR_CONF_FILTER, which is > > passed > > by Pulseview to api.c of hantek-dso function 'config_list'. > > Handling of SR_CONF_FILTER has been removed from 'config_list' by > > Bert > > Vermeulen <b...@biot.com> on the 2014-10-27 in commit > > 933defaa03abe4f3f01eff8067c3f0060914b050 (SR_CONF_FILTER no longer > > is > > a listable (enum) option, but binary (no need to get list of values > > from driver). 'config_list' returns SR_ERR_NA and PulseView exits > > with > > message 'Exception: not applicable'. > > > > Correct fix for this issue is to have PulseView bind SR_CONF_FILTER > > to > > binary instead of enum: > > Looks correct, merged. Thanks! > > Can you please also check if you can reproduce this issue? > > http://sigrok.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464 > > Which device did you use for your testing btw? DSO-2090? > > It looks similar in nature, might have already been fixed in the mean > time, though. > > > Cheers, Uwe. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
