On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 17:59 +0100, Rene Kita wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:55:36PM +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> > This is a call for testers. Especially on those platforms which
> > are not exactly mainstream. That is: anything outside of one of
> > the popular Linux distros, which I used in a local setup.
> I successfully tested this on Alpine Linux 3.13.2.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> I also tested this on OpenBSD 6.8:
Thank you for these tests, which is the most extensive feedback
that became available so far (here and in the chat). Have said it
in IRC, will repeat here for the record.
That a platform may or may not provide support for LTO, or
whether it's the platform's default, is not so much of an issue.
The real question is: When a platform provides either or both,
will all these configurations result in proper behaviour? You
answered that for those platforms. Thank you! And congratulations
to the lucky hand at picking "interesting" candidates. :-]
Have pushed a few more commits, including the "whole archive"
attempt, which works here for me (Linux, and MXE, with autotools
and with cmake).
Some minor stuff showed up, like cmake version dependencies, ld
version dependencies (push/pop state). Have applied a quick
bandaid without much care, given that the most important goal of
the experiment is the drivers list construction, not the ideal
autotools compatibility or toolchain feature detection. Those
nits are independent of the list construction from selected and
thus involved objects.
virtually yours
Gerhard Sittig
--
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
_______________________________________________
sigrok-devel mailing list
sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
