Also, RaiMan, I'm on the latest version of Sikuli (r930) and when I use print exists(pattern)
then it returns me a _Match_ with a similarity score higher than I get with find() not a Boolean. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is subscribed to Sikuli. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087315 Title: Exists behavior: pattern matching score differs between IDE and actual run Status in Sikuli: New Bug description: I have the following situation: I'm trying to see if one variant of an image exists, and if it doesn't, then I continue to the next variant. I'm using the IDE to determine the match parameters; the threshold for my value to appear in the matches is 0.58; below that, it will give me false positives. As the color does not need to match perfectly, I'm currently matching at 0.75. However, when I use the exists() method, it will return me a _false positive_, but the match is high; 0.77. This is incorrect and inconsistent with the find() method, which would have ignored this piece. The image i'm trying to match is an orange button, with white text; on the page, it will match a piece of a band of solid gray, the same size, but it has none of the details that the source image exhibits. Is this a known issue? And if so, apart from different pattern match criteria, can I do to avoid having this discrepancy? BTW: still on W7/64 with r930. Vision algorithm is at its default settings, haven't changed anything there. Can send the images by email on request, but I'd rather not share on a public place. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/sikuli/+bug/1087315/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
