Public bug reported:
In the docs it says that findAll should cause a FindFailed exception if there
are no matches in 1.1
(http://sikulix-2014.readthedocs.io/en/latest/region.html#Region.findAll). The
actual behavior, however, seems to be that it returns a None object. I can make
my code account for both, but which of these is the correct behavior moving
forward?
(reported directly to RaiMan by Minyoung Choi)
All find operations (except exists by design) should report FindFailed
and support the FindFailed response concept.
** Affects: sikuli
Importance: High
Assignee: RaiMan (raimund-hocke)
Status: Fix Committed
** Changed in: sikuli
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: sikuli
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: sikuli
Assignee: (unassigned) => RaiMan (raimund-hocke)
** Changed in: sikuli
Milestone: None => 1.1.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Sikuli
Drivers, which is subscribed to Sikuli.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677134
Title:
[1.1.1] findAll() should throw FindFailed
Status in Sikuli:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
In the docs it says that findAll should cause a FindFailed exception if there
are no matches in 1.1
(http://sikulix-2014.readthedocs.io/en/latest/region.html#Region.findAll). The
actual behavior, however, seems to be that it returns a None object. I can make
my code account for both, but which of these is the correct behavior moving
forward?
(reported directly to RaiMan by Minyoung Choi)
All find operations (except exists by design) should report FindFailed
and support the FindFailed response concept.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sikuli/+bug/1677134/+subscriptions
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
