All the best for your holidays. I made some tests now with 1.1.3 and have to admit, that exists() and findAll() might not always give the same result.
See the documented workaround. ** Summary changed: - [1.1.3] findAll fails but image exists --- workaround + [1.1.3] findAll fails but image exists --- workaround --- fixed in 1.1.4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Sikuli Drivers, which is subscribed to Sikuli. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833356 Title: [1.1.3] findAll fails but image exists --- workaround --- fixed in 1.1.4 Status in Sikuli: Confirmed Bug description: ******************************** workaround ;-) best workaround is to use 1.1.4 for 1.1.3: using exists(), wait() or find() and getting a similarity score of x, then with findAll() the same image might come up with a score of x - 0.03 down to x - 0.1. so using exists(Pattern(someImage).similar(score)) then this will assure, to come back with the same result (first match): findAll(Pattern(someImage).similar(score - 0.1)) ---------------------------------------------------- Code def Find_All_Close_X(v_Image): if exists(v_Image,0.2): v_Pos = find(v_Image) print "v_Pos",v_Pos hover(Location(v_Pos.x,v_Pos.y)) print "hovering",v_Pos.x,v_Pos.y popup("Found and hovering") v_Result = findAll(v_Image) else: print "Not Found" v_Image_p = "/home/jeff/SikuliScripts_Linux/Subs/Vikings/Close X big Region.png" sx = 422 ; sy = 132 ; sw = 505 ; sh = 270 setRect(sx,sy,sw,sh) g_Find_Matching = 0.85 for i in range(20): print "^ " * 40 ,"Try", g_Find_Matching v_Image = Pattern(v_Image_p).similar(g_Find_Matching) Find_All_Close_X(v_Image) g_Find_Matching = g_Find_Matching - 0.01 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/sikuli/+bug/1833356/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sikuli-driver More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
