On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 03:02:34PM +0530, Venkat Mangudi wrote: > > What would the ideal company that you could trust with your email look like? > > I wish I knew. I would not be asking such questions then. :-)
It's not rocket science, it's email. Depending on inhouse skills such critical piece of infrastructure has to be maintained in-house. If you're too small, get an external consultant in to set up the systems and processes, and control of processes. > Back when Google started gmail, there was quite a bit of discussion in > Silk about it. There were quite a few against it and some of the Why would you use free email by a company that's reading your mail and selling you ads, and doing heavy data mining on your data? Are you nuts? > concerns were that Google was going to keep it searchable even after it That's not a concern. Google never deletes anything. Why should they do it in this instance? What kind of proof can they offer that they deleted you data? What about the ISPs, and the TLAs, will they issue proof that they deleted all the tapped data, too? > has been deleted and such. I was wondering if those who were against it > then have something interesting to say about this article by Cringley. Why are speculations on speculations interesting? -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
