On 20/02/06, calvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My basic question comes down to this: the right to free speech has > > always been limited by the fact that the speaker would be forced to > take the consequences of his speech. Calling someone a liar may get > you sued for libel, for example. However, there doesn't seem any > consequence for being gratuitously offensive against a religion. > > -- b > > You could: > * wait until the religious hatred law is passed then sue them in the UK > * kill the bastard (perfectly acceptable in some territories) > * invade Denmark (not illegal)
Yeah, it's ruled by bleeding heart liberals -- what's all this rot about freedom of speech, anyway? We need regime-change over there. Let's call Dubya. -- b PS: Any oil in Denmark? :-)
