Re: [silk] ID-related stuff: the kook speaks again :-)

[Deepa Mohan]

wooHOO...talk about topic bombardment! I didn't see a point of view  that said human beings are too complex to be evolved, but everything else seems to be there. Where is this discussion heading from here? Looks like the arms of a fractal....


"the more we know, the more we know how little we know."

On 5/12/06, Udhay Shankar N < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jeremiah S. Joseph wrote: [ on 04:08 PM 5/12/2006 ]

>Finally, pretty much everyone is familiar with the arguments for
>evolution

This is not true, in my experience. (How did you arrive at this conclusion?)

However, in the spirit of adding to the fun, here is some stuff:

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html

Udhay

PS: bonus link:
http://www.skepticreport.com/creationism/thingscreationistshate.htm

--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))