At 2006-08-21 15:19:59 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Not to be taking sides, but can't "free energy" be a tortured > euphemism for "renewable source of energy"? "Free" is a lot more > attention provoking, which may have been the intended effect. Pool up > money for one ad in a prestigious publication, and word it such that > everyone's going to talk about it, saving on ad-spend.
A nice theory, but "ad-spend" is not exactly how you invite peer review for scientific discoveries. -- ams
