Thaths wrote:
On 8/24/06, Vinayak Hegde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This was on the cards for a long time. Now there are 8 planets
instead of 9 or 12 (proposed earlier). How would the astrologers
react to this after humans (whose fate is supposedly controlled
by planetary motions) change the status of planets themselves.
It might be interesting to see how long it takes for textbooks
to change.
That is easy. Indian astrologers have never considered Plutu to be a
planet. So-called plannet in Indian cosmology include the moon and the
fictitious Rahu and Kethu.
Aren't you forgetting Budhan (Mars?), Sukran (?), Shani (Saturn?) and
the others from the nava-graham (nine planets) (I can't seem to recall
the rest)?
Cheeni
