Re: [silk] Bush more dangerous than Kim Jong-II

[Bernhard Krieger]

Udhay Shankar N wrote:


Udhay,

Would you be interested in this for your list ?

<http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1938434,00.html>http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1938434,00.html 




British believe Bush is more dangerous than Kim Jong-II



(they get no points for getting it right after the time is over.)

the brits never supported the iraq war. there were 2 millions on the 
streets in 2003 and opinion pols showed the british population was 
strongly against the war.

-b