industrialised agriculture is cheaper and more efficient, usually, than
small-scale farming. african farmers could certainly find ways to reduce
the cost of their production, by improving infrastructure, local
iniatives, etc. but whether or not they do so, it is fair for them,
perhaps, to compete with the prices of industrialised agriculture from
europe or the US. it is not fair and quite unreasonable to expect them
to compete against _subsidised_ industrialised agriculture from europe
or the US.

the higher cost of inefficient production in africa is offset at least
partially by lower labour costs; but even this advantage is lost in
competition with heavily subsidised european farming. anti-competitive
subsidies are not the only dimension, but they are certainly an
important one.

-rishab

On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 17:57 +0300, ashok _ wrote:
> i hear this argument of subsidies directly impoverishing the third
> world very often in africa....but to me, for various reasons, the
> argument is fundamentally flawed as it makes the problem one
> dimensional....


Reply via email to