Dave Long wrote:

[...]

The odd assumption here is that a more courageous fighter will always be a more effective fighter. The ancient greeks wrote of the need to temper courage, and the invention of the machine gun has only made it more obvious.

Apropos of nothing except the trigger words, I've been wondering what exactly it is that makes a technologically advanced army like the US Army falter when faced with a rabble of guerrillas and insurgents.

I believe the missing element is human courage. There is a rather interesting book on the Tunnels of Chu-Chi (of the same name), which plays out the lives of the tunnel warriors of Vietnam in detail even if the authors were really attempting to cover the lives of the tunnel rats of the US Army.

The tunnel rats venturing into the underground tunnel networks of Chu-Chi were hard men, volunteering for a daunting task that not many had the stomach for. They were treated reverentially by their mates for they fought the battle on the enemy's turf. The tunnel rats went into the tunnels usually only when gas and grenades didn't work. They spoke of inhuman conditions below ground and had to recuperate after every visit to the tunnels.

This is all very fine unless you consider that whole villages of Vietnam were living in those inhuman tunnels with their children, buffaloes and rice crops. They braved snakes, cave-ins, vermin and suffocation every day. They feasted on earthworms and rats, using the little rice that was grown underground to nourish the sick and the infants. There were many who spent 12-24 months underground without ever seeing the open sky for more than a few minutes in a week or standing straight for the whole time.

When you consider that the modern warriors of the US Army live in air conditioned comfort in the Iraqi battle zone listening to their ipods and playing on their XBoxen while fighting a war they don't believe in, it is clear that no amount of hardware can match up to real human courage and will.

The Vietnamese had the will, the Iraqis and Taliban seem to posses it, whither the Americans who plainly state that less than 4% of the force on ground in Iraq constitutes the fighting force?

Cheeni


Reply via email to