I agree.. quite pointless. This is research for the sake of it. Adit. On 2/15/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not particularly surprising (that some sequences just don't work in some species is well known among gene plumbers), and not at all exciting. Kauffman would probably just shrug his shoulders, and do a "told you so". I do not see the point in using these sequences as tags (combinatorial explosions makes even short random sequences unique), and as to a suicide gene, there are plenty of toxins. They're a bit larger, admittedly.
