On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:54:32PM +0530, Udhay Shankar N wrote: > Eugen Leitl wrote [ at 10:52 PM 2/16/2007 ] : > > >> I fail to see how this is different from what Kunstler is saying. > > > >Kunstler doesn't understand physics very well. > > Expand, please?
It would take a line by line rebuttal of his essay, which I don't have the time for. He dismisses hydrogen as a hoax for no reason, and pushes nuclear power for no good reason (unless he'd mention thorium, then he'd have a minor point). There are many such half-truths there. I don't think he's misrepresenting on purpose, he probably really doesn't know. I haven't seen a single accurate description of the problem space in a single article, or even given a book-length treatment, anywhere. No wonder politics has no clue -- if the voters don't, who'd expect that? -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
