On 3/10/07, shiv sastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 10 Mar 2007 5:09 pm, ashok _ wrote:
> Now mind you, this was a purely casual conversation, it did not imply
> anything at all, neither from me, nor from her. There were no implicit
> or explicit messages here. It was clearly understood from both
> sides...
This is an unusual conversation indeed.
I don't think a man and a woman "casually" have this sort of conversation with
anyone, Indian or not on the second or third casual meeting unless there is
an undercurrent of other signals in the air.
In Botswana, at least, this *could* have been a pretty casual
conversation -- possibly because sex itself was pretty casual.
Odd, really. You'd think that, with the population we have, there'd be
a lot of sex going on and Indians would be less repressed about it out
of sheer familiarity.
I guess Indians mostly reproduce asexually.
-- b
