On 4/17/07, Thaths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've seen many schools in India that claimed to be Montessori schools.
However, they seem to be following the same curriculum and processes
as any other school. Have any of you heard of /real/ Montessori
schools in India? I am especially interested in ones in Mumbai and
Chennai.

I came across this article in Slate this morning:

http://www.slate.com/id/2166489/fr/rss/

The Cult of the Pink Tower
Montessori turns 100—what the hell is it?
By Emily Bazelon
Posted Saturday, May 19, 2007, at 7:29 AM ET

When Maria Montessori docked in New York on her first trip to America
in 1913, crowds greeted her ship and her arrival made the front pages.
Montessori, Italy's first woman doctor, was toasted as a revolutionary
educator. By the end of her visit a few weeks later, "It seemed
reasonable to suppose that American education would never be the same
again," Rita Kramer writes in Maria Montessori: A Biography.

Instead, interest in Montessori's method withered in the United
States. When she decided to leave Italy in 1934 because Mussolini's
regime was interfering with her schools, Montessori decamped to
Holland. While her reform movement had influence in Europe and Asia,
Kramer writes how it "took on more and more of the character of a
special cult rather than becoming part of the mainstream of
educational theory and practice."

It took the free spirit of the 1960s to revive Montessori education in
the United States. Montessori herself had died a decade earlier, but
her emphasis on children's "absorbent minds" and their capacity to
teach themselves aligned with the era's rebellion against school's
traditional strictures. Montessori classrooms, with their silver
candlesticks (for polishing), beautiful toylike cubes, and child-size
shelves and bins, seemed like the perfect romantic alternative to
boring workbooks and rows of desks. They still do. Mothering Magazine,
my own barometer of granola parenting gone too far, calls them
"magical" and filled with a "sense of wonder." On the 100th
anniversary of the 1907 opening of Montessori's first school—in the
slums of Rome—5,000 schools devoted to her method dot the United
States, with another 17,000 worldwide. Many are preschools, but some
are for older kids as well.

Montessori would have expected no less, as she became quite the grande
dame in her later years. But she would not be pleased about the
confusion that continues to surround her method. In many ways,
Montessori education remains a cult: No one outside the fold (and lots
of families inside it) really knows what exactly it is. The fog of
magic and romance obscures the key to a Montessori classroom: It's all
about structure and framework and purpose. Maria Montessori might have
called the child "an amorphous, splendid being in search of his own
proper form," but far more important, in the end, is a different canny
insight of hers: Those splendid kids crave order.

My son Simon, who is 4, has spent the year at a Montessori school in
Bethesda, Md., and I confess that I have remained one of the clueless.
This is partly because parents aren't part of the scene in his
classroom: We drop the kids off outside the door and are tolerated
inside rarely and briefly. In the beginning, this was disconcerting.
The night before Simon's first day of school, I worried about the next
morning's sudden drop-off—it felt semiabusive. But when Simon started
trotting off to school without complaint and chattering about the pink
tower and the movable alphabet, I switched to congratulating myself
for having chosen well, if blindly.

This week, I got permission to show up and watch. Promptly at 9 a.m.,
Simon's teacher clapped her hands, stared down my son and his friends,
who were chortling over a book of Star Wars stickers, and said,
"Gentlemen, it's time to get into our work." The "work" thing is one
of Maria Montessori's quirks—she thought children's imaginary play was
a waste of time. For months, I made fun of it. But you know what? The
kids don't. Within minutes, two dozen of them were dispersed around
the room, intent on their morning's pursuit.

Simon's friend Caleb set to work on a "long sevens chain," which is a
chain built from increments of beads separated into groups of seven.
Caleb marked his progress with little number tabs. He'd gotten up to
294 and figured out that 301 came next. A girl named Sailor took out
the pink tower, a collection of different sized pink cubes, and
stacked it. Nicholas wrote "spyder" and "fly" and "prayin mant" with
the movable alphabet. Each letter is a grippable 3-inch rubber cutout,
with blue for consonants and red for vowels. And Simon, my
irrepressible, short-fused man of mischief, calmly rolled out a mat
for himself on the floor, took out the "bank," and proceeded to match
the number 3,987, which he'd constructed from short boards painted
with numbers, to the correct combination of 1,000-unit cubes, 100- and
10-unit rectangles, and single-unit beads. (Click to see photos of the
materials.)

All of this activity proves my point about the Montessori method: It
is structured, sometimes rigidly so. It's about the appeal of
precision: Sailor's pink cubes fit together only in one way, so she
instinctively corrected herself when she mis-stacked them. Montessori
isn't magic. It's fine-tuned and detail-driven and tactile, like a
workshop for two dozen good-humored but serious young elves.

Last fall, the prestigious Science gave its pages to a well-designed
study that found some measurable advantages for the Montessori method.
The researchers compared 59 Montessori students with 53 kids who'd
tried to get in to a public Montessori school in Wisconsin and lost
out in a lottery (a strategy that addressed the methodological concern
that families who choose Montessori differ from those who don't). By
the end of kindergarten, the Montessori students outscored the others
on standardized tests of reading and math, treated each other better
on the playground, and "showed more concern for fairness and justice."
By the end of elementary school, the test-score gap closed. But the
Montessori kids "wrote more creative essays with more complex sentence
structures," responded better to social dilemmas, and were more likely
to say they felt a sense of community at school.

The Wisconsin school in the study was urban and mostly minority.
That's a contrast to the private and upscale cast of Montessori in the
United States. But that norm is starting to change, with between 250
and 300 public Montessori schools now open across the country. Maria
Montessori started her revolution among Italy's pauper children, so it
makes sense that her method is effective without the head start of
affluence. The biggest problem for American Montessori education at
the moment may be about identification. Any school can call itself a
Montessori school, which doesn't bode well for quality control. The
real test of a school's worth is probably teacher training. Through
various colleges and universities, the Association Montessori
Internationale offers full-time, nine-month courses for college
graduates that are the hallmark of Montessori-ness. Simon's teacher
says the one she went to was much harder than her college coursework.

The Montessori culture smacks faintly of indoctrination. But maybe
it's that intensity, as well as Maria Montessori's basic wisdom that
kids can teach themselves if they're operating within a sturdy
framework, which accounts for the continuing appeal of her schools.
Other alternative education movements imported from Europe are
similarly self-assured. The Waldorf method, founded by Austrian
scientist Rudolf Steiner in 1919, stresses uninterrupted imaginary
play (take that, Maria), bans TV, and keeps students with the same
teacher for seven years. The Reggio Emilia schools, a product of Italy
post-World War II, stress long-term projects and an environment filled
with beauty. The ardent adherents of each method keep it alive by
keeping the faith. So, thanks, from the rest of us hangers-on. And see
you in high school.

A version of this article also appears in the Outlook section of the
Sunday Washington Post.
Emily Bazelon is a Slate senior editor.

--
Homer: He has all the money in the world, but there's one thing he can't buy.
Marge: What's that?
Homer: (pause) A dinosaur.
                           -- Homer J. Simpson
Sudhakar Chandra                                    Slacker Without Borders

Reply via email to