Thirty years too late I have entry to the high school boys' locker room;-) and can eavesdrop on the "aimless" conversations!
2007/6/5, shiv sastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
How come nobody factors in the possibility of aiming one's dick to send pee through the hole when the seat is down? A man peeing is not a high altitude bomber raid on a World War 2 target - if you can measure 2 feet between tip and toilet either someone is abnormally tall or something is abnormally short. If you can miss that - where is the guarantee that you will hit anything when the seat is up? Seems like an "aimless" exercise to me. shiv On Monday 04 Jun 2007 10:14 pm, Rishab Aiyer Ghosh wrote: > summary: it is inefficient as a social norm, but perfect equilibrium, > once the cost of women yelling at men who leave the seat up is modelled. > > http://www.scq.ubc.ca/the-social-norm-of-leaving-the-toilet-seat-down-a-gam >e-theoretic-analysis/
