Wow!

And I thought after Lincoln, it would be tough to like another American
political figure! 

- Vinit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> et] On Behalf Of Udhay Shankar N
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 2:19 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [silk] The Transformation of Al Gore
> 
> Very interesting piece from Fast Company on how 
> Al Gore has gone from failed politician to tycoon and 
> (potentially) kingmaker.
> 
> Udhay
> 
> http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/117/features-gore_Printer_
> Friendly.html
> 
> Fast Company
> Al Gore's $100 Million Makeover
> 
> Not long ago, he was the butt of jokes--lockbox, 
> earth tones, a postelection beard. Then he dusted 
> off an old slide show and jumped with both feet 
> into the private sector. The untold story of how 
> an epic loser engineered what may be the greatest brand 
> makeover of our time.
> 
> From: Issue 117 | July 2007 | Page 70 | By: Ellen McGirt
> 
> Al Gore is a funny guy. And, for his $175,000 
> speaking fee, he tells this story: after leaving 
> the White House and heading back to Tennessee 
> sans motorcade--"in a rented Ford Taurus," he 
> sniffs--he and Tipper stop to get a bite to eat 
> at a Shoney's, "which, as you may know, is a 
> low-cost family restaurant." The people in the 
> restaurant "made a huge fuss...over Tipper." 
> Then, a man spies Gore and stage-whispers, 
> "Didn't he used to be the Vice President? He's 
> fallen so low." Peals of delight from the 
> audience. Gore smiles back. It's a nice moment.
> 
> But wait, there's more. Later, he goes on, he 
> attempts the same story in Nigeria. Punch line, 
> laughter, applause--no problem. The next day, an 
> official at the airport yells out to him, "Call 
> Washington!" Hmmm. "What could be wrong in 
> Washington?" he muses, scratching his chin. 
> "That's when I remembered it could be a lot of things." The 
> crowd goes wild.
> 
> Come to find out, Gore explains, a reporter in 
> Nigeria had lost a bit of the story in 
> translation. "Vice President Al Gore announced 
> yesterday that he and his wife, Tipper, have 
> opened a low-cost family restaurant called 
> Shoney's and will be running it themselves," Gore 
> intones. By the time he landed in the United 
> States, the story had hit the wires, and he 
> was--again--the butt of jokes on Leno and 
> Letterman. Three days later, he received a 
> handwritten note from Bill Clinton, 
> congratulating him on the Shoney's deal. "We like 
> to celebrate each other's successes in life," 
> Gore deadpans to uproarious laughter.
> 
> Funny guy, indeed. In one well-delivered 
> anecdote, Gore manages to make fun of himself, 
> the election, his relationship with his former 
> boss, the Bush administration, and the media--and 
> still come out on top. Gone is the robo-candidate 
> who provided fodder for conservative bile and 
> late-night merrymaking. (For a good time, google 
> "SNL" and "lockbox.") After the 2000 election, 
> Gore might have slunk away to a loser's life: a 
> memoir here, a visiting professorship there, the 
> occasional keynote speech or celebrity golf 
> tournament. Instead, in what may be the greatest 
> brand makeover in history, Gore is being hailed 
> as a visionary who was right about everything 
> from global warming to Iraq. At 59, he's an 
> Academy Award winner, a bestselling author, a 
> front-runner for the Nobel Prize, and a concert 
> promoter who turned out to be a bigger rock star 
> at this year's Grammys than the rock stars themselves.
> 
> What no one is talking about is that he has also 
> become a stunningly successful businessman--and 
> that has fueled his comeback. Since his 
> nonelection, Gore has become a millionaire many 
> times over, bringing him, in financial terms, 
> shoulder to shoulder with the C-suite denizens he 
> used to hit up for campaign cash. In addition to 
> the steady flow of six-figure speaking gigs, he 
> has become an insider at two of the hottest 
> companies on the planet: at Google, where he 
> signed on as an adviser in 2001, pre-IPO (and 
> received stock options now reportedly worth north 
> of $30 million), and at Apple, where he joined 
> the board in 2003 (and got stock options now 
> valued at about $6 million). He enjoyed a big 
> payday as vice chairman of an investment firm in 
> L.A., and, more recently, started a 
> cable-television company and an asset-management 
> firm, both of which are becoming quiet forces in their fields.
> 
> Financial disclosure documents released before 
> the 2000 election put the Gore family's net worth 
> at $1 million to $2 million. After years of 
> public service--and four kids needing high-priced 
> educations--Al and Tipper used to fret 
> occasionally about money. Not anymore. They have 
> a new multimillion-dollar home in a tony section 
> of Nashville and a family home in Virginia, and 
> have recently bought a multimillion-dollar condo 
> at the St. Regis condo/hotel in San Francisco. 
> Available data indicate a net worth well in excess of $100 million.
> 
> It's good to be the president, even 
> metaphorically, of Al Gore Inc. And that helps 
> explain why he's wary of reentering the political 
> fray. Here, then, is the untold tale of Gore's unlikely rebirth.
> 
> Gore greets me at the door of his suite at the 
> Regency Hotel in New York in late May: "I haven't 
> seen you since Orlando!" He is in the city to 
> promote his new book, The Assault on Reason. I'd 
> first been introduced to him several weeks 
> earlier at the Tribeca Film Festival, and we 
> chatted again briefly in Orlando, Florida, at a 
> tech-geek conference of Adobe software 
> enthusiasts (who were treated to his 
> global-warming speech, including the Shoney's 
> bit). But this is our first official interview, 
> and he begins with his game face on. Ever polite, 
> he has been fielding questions about politics 
> nonstop--including at a taping of the PBS show 
> Charlie Rose the night before. He visibly 
> relaxes, though, when we start talking about 
> global business. "I have really enjoyed the 
> business world much more than I expected," Gore 
> says, settling back in his chair. He speaks 
> animatedly about incentive structures and how 
> information flow creates opportunities.
> 
> One problem he had in politics, he says, was 
> identifying an issue too early--"'predawn' is the 
> term I use"--to be able to act on it. But "in the 
> business world, particularly at a time when 
> things are moving so swiftly, if you can see it 
> early, you can make a business opportunity out of 
> it." He pauses. "For whatever reason, the 
> business world rewards a long-term perspective 
> more than the political world does."
> 
> By his own account, his makeover has been less 
> the result of a conscious strategy than of a few 
> smart initiatives that happened to ripen in 
> sync--from Google's towering growth to the recent 
> profitability of his media startup, Current TV. 
> "I've remarked to Tipper how amazing it is that 
> both Current and Generation [Investment 
> Management] have reached the next stage of their 
> development at almost exactly the same time." 
> What defines the ventures he has taken part in, 
> he says, is "a revolutionary and transformational 
> concept" in industries that badly need change. 
> But did he expect such enormous financial 
> success? He pauses. "It's all been a pleasant surprise. And a 
> lot of fun."
> 
> That's not how things looked in the first years 
> after that trip back to Nashville. In the spring 
> of 2001, Gore returned from a vacation in the 
> Mediterranean with an unfortunate beard, and the 
> late-night jokesters had a field day. His first 
> business move--signing on as an adviser to 
> Google--proved prescient, but Google wasn't yet a 
> powerhouse. Almost no one took note. (On his 
> first day at Google, Gore recalls with a laugh, 
> "Larry [Page] and Sergey [Brin] and the entire 
> executive team had false beards on.")
> 
> His most public effort was dusting off a slide 
> show on global warming he had put together in 
> 1989. It was full of depressing data about 
> melting ice caps and killer hurricanes--not a 
> likely vehicle to spark a resurrection. As 
> recently as May 2004, he took some serious 
> ribbing for presenting a version of it at an 
> event timed to coincide with the goofy 
> global-warming film The Day After Tomorrow. A few 
> months later, when television producer turned 
> environmental activist Laurie David invited her 
> A-list pals to see the slide show, she had a hard 
> time getting them to attend. "People were still 
> mad about the election," she recalls. "And nobody cared about 
> global warming."
> 
> What has changed since then is, in part, 
> political: John Kerry fared worse than Gore at 
> the polls, and President George W. Bush has seen 
> his approval ratings tumble. Hurricane Katrina 
> played a role, too, stirring fears of climate 
> change. But Gore's business efforts have also 
> come together in a crescendo that cannot be 
> ignored. In fact, to understand the personal 
> drive and vision behind Gore's revival--and the 
> philosophy that continues to take his business, 
> if not his political, brand forward--the place to 
> begin is with his two entrepreneurial efforts, Current TV and 
> Generation.
> 
> Joel Hyatt is comfortably ensconced in his 
> loft-style San Francisco office at Current TV, Al 
> Gore's now-profitable cable network. Hyatt, the 
> CEO, is a longtime friend of Gore's who made his 
> millions by founding Hyatt Legal Plans, a 
> provider of low-cost legal services that was 
> acquired by MetLife in 1997. He has taught 
> entrepreneurship at Stanford's business school 
> and chaired the Democratic finance committee 
> during the 2000 election. He doesn't talk easily 
> about his front-row view of Gore's disputed loss, 
> and when he does, his voice shakes with emotion. 
> "It's hard to move on from something like that," he says.
> 
> But he did. After the election, Hyatt began 
> talking with Gore about the sorry state of 
> television and the role that the broadcast media 
> play in the public sphere. "The line between news 
> and entertainment is blurred," as Gore now puts 
> it. "Much of TV is mind deadening. It's a one-way 
> conduit of knowledge." The two men discussed what 
> Hyatt calls "an utter lack of innovation in the 
> media industry"--a barely disguised oligopoly, as 
> they saw it, controlling both content and 
> competition. "We decided that we wanted to build 
> a new kind of media company to democratize--small 
> d--television first and the media industry 
> generally," Hyatt says. They would give viewers 
> from 18 to 34 the means to create and control 
> what went on the air--a user-generated model now 
> familiar thanks to the likes of YouTube and 
> MySpace, but a shot in the dark for TV back in 2002.
> 
> Undaunted, Gore and Hyatt went looking to buy a 
> cable-TV network. The effort quickly became a 
> disaster. Meetings were taken, favors were called 
> in, but nobody wanted them. "We were told 
> repeatedly, 'You're not going to start a 
> cable-television company,'" Hyatt recalls. 
> "'There's no room in the industry for you. 
> Period.'" The only possibility they could find 
> was a yawner of a Canadian news network, called 
> Newsworld International, or NWI, owned by the 
> French company Vivendi. Yet even here, Gore and 
> Hyatt were initially rebuffed. Gore had to tap 
> then French president Jacques Chirac to arrange a 
> meeting with Vivendi executives. Negotiations 
> dragged on for months. "There were probably at 
> least seven or eight times when [the deal] was 
> dead and all but buried," Gore recalls. Finally, 
> after nearly a year of nail biting and a cameo 
> appearance by Barry Diller, who owned a part of 
> the entities--Gore lobbied him in person--Gore 
> and Hyatt snagged NWI in May 2004 for $70 
> million. (Their investment partners included 
> former Goldman Sachs senior director Philip 
> Murphy, who is now the Democratic finance 
> committee chair; Richard Blum, husband of 
> California Senator Dianne Feinstein; Sun 
> Microsystems cofounder Bill Joy; and Bob Pittman, 
> former chief operating officer of AOL Time Warner.)
> 
> They had the network, renamed Current TV, but 
> they still didn't know precisely what it would 
> air. At a meeting around Hyatt's kitchen table in 
> the summer of 2004, the nascent management team 
> kicked around ideas--and kicked them to the curb. 
> One option was to give 200 talented unknowns all 
> around the world video equipment, train them, and 
> set them loose to tell stories. Hyatt and Gore's 
> response: Not good enough. Gore was looking for 
> something "transformational," recalls Current 
> exec Joanna Drake Earl, a veteran of Paul Allen's 
> Moxi media startup. "Transformational?" Earl 
> remembers with a laugh. "I mean...that's hard to manage to."
> 
> As Current's August 1, 2005, launch date 
> approached--the old Canadian news programming 
> would end July 31--tensions ran high. "At one 
> point," says president of programming David 
> Neuman, who had produced sitcoms on NBC and Fox, 
> "I got down on my hands and knees and begged for 
> more time." Finally, the team agreed on a 
> formula. They would hire a crew of "vanguard 
> journalists," but work toward the goal of 
> creating a network largely shaped by its viewers, 
> via a Web site that functioned like a production community.
> 
>      Current TV, Gore's cable channel, turned a profit in 
> only two years.
> 
> Today, less than two years in, at least 30% of 
> the network's content is viewer generated, called 
> VC2. Amateur filmmakers, some in their teens, 
> upload three- to eight-minute documentary-style 
> nonfiction segments, called "pods," to the 
> Current Web site. Online modules help aspiring 
> filmmakers navigate everything from framing a 
> shot to negotiating music rights. The online 
> community comments on the videos and votes to 
> "green-light" pods that they want to see on air. 
> Makers of the pods that are aired get $500; 
> Current gets a library of content to use in 
> perpetuity--with no production costs.
> 
> The result is surprisingly engaging and unlike 
> anything else on TV. The pods shuffle through 
> everything from cutting-edge bands and dogsled 
> races, to African villagers struggling with 
> HIV/AIDs and dispatches from soldiers serving in Iraq.
> 
> Current has also worked with advertisers to 
> create viewer-generated commercials, or VCAMs. To 
> date, some 32 VCAMs have hit the air. "Once we 
> heard the concept, we got on board early on," 
> says Brett Dennis, director of media marketing 
> for T-Mobile, which also runs traditional spots 
> on the network. "It provided us with a 
> groundbreaking way to reach customers, and to 
> encourage them to engage with our brand." Plus, 
> it's delightfully cheap: $1,000 for every 
> commercial that gets on the air. (If the ad is 
> distributed on other networks, the fee can go up 
> to $50,000.) T-Mobile has already selected three 
> VCAMs, and hopes to do more; other VCAM 
> advertisers include Pop Secret, Sony, and 
> L'Oréal. Says Dennis: "It's the best example 
> we've seen of the convergence of a traditional 
> network model and the user-generated Internet model."
> 
> Gore is clearly happy with Current TV's progress 
> and optimistic about its future. "The more people 
> who are watching, and the more people who are 
> contributing, the higher and higher the quality 
> goes of the pods from which we select." He adds, 
> "One of the happy problems we've had is 
> explaining Current TV to investors and 
> distributors. Nobody would believe how low our 
> production costs were, or how good the business 
> model was." Current TV is now in 38 million U.S. 
> homes via DirecTV, Comcast, Dish Network, AT&T 
> U-Verse, and Time Warner Cable. Its expansion 
> this year to the UK and Ireland on BSkyB and 
> Virgin Media will put it in another 8.2 million homes.
> 
>      "We have a belief that explicit recognition 
> of environmental, social, governance, economic, 
> and ethical factors affect business," says Blood.
> 
> Current TV is making money, about a 10% margin on 
> cash flow, after less than two years, according 
> to analyst estimates; new cable networks 
> typically take four to six years to go into the 
> black. "Partly it's because they inherited some 
> distribution on DirecTV when they acquired NWI," 
> says Derek Baine, a senior analyst with Kagan 
> Research. He estimates that Current's license fee 
> is about 12 cents per month per subscriber, 
> roughly what an established player like Lifetime 
> gets, and projects that advertising, now 24% of 
> revenue, will pass the industry average of 43% by 
> 2010. "I think their model has made other networks sit up and 
> pay attention."
> 
> While Gore was struggling to launch his cable 
> network in late 2003, he was also moving on 
> another front: starting an investment firm based 
> on a new definition of sustainability. 
> Metropolitan West Financial, an L.A.-based 
> asset-management outfit where he'd been vice 
> chairman for two years, had just been sold to 
> Wachovia. (Gore's former Senate chief of staff, 
> Peter Knight, was a Met West managing director 
> and had recruited him.) Gore had his hefty payout 
> from the deal, plus a desire "to incorporate 
> sustainability values into the financial-services 
> work that I was doing." Goldman's Murphy 
> introduced him to David Blood, then CEO of 
> Goldman Sachs Asset Management. "They were both 
> talking to me about similar things," Murphy 
> recalls, "deep conversations about emerging 
> markets, sustainability issues, and new ways of 
> making investments. They were both asking, 'Can 
> this make money? Can this be a business?'"
> 
> "I was interested in creating a business around 
> investing, which I love, and philanthropy," Blood 
> says. He and Gore met many times, both in London, 
> where Blood is based, and in the United States, 
> to talk about values and skills. "It's not 
> exactly like choosing a spouse," Blood says of 
> selecting a business partner. But it's close. 
> "You have to know that you can work together, 
> have the difficult conversations. You need 100% 
> trust and confidence." They worked together on a 
> statement of values for their company, which they 
> named Generation Investment Management. When they 
> launched in August 2004, they made no move to 
> attract outside investors--which, despite the 
> catcalls from Gore detractors, was entirely by 
> design, says Blood. "We spent a year playing with 
> our own money," he says--a pool of about $100 
> million from himself, Gore, Knight (whom Gore 
> brought in from Met West), and three other 
> founding partners. "We didn't want to raise money 
> first and then come up with an idea," Blood says. 
> "What we really needed to do was invent a new language."
> 
> Rather than rely on short-term earnings 
> projections, they thought long-term investment 
> potential--and good management--could be better 
> gauged by looking at factors such as whether a 
> company was preparing for a carbon-neutral 
> future. Environmental stewardship, though, is 
> just part of how Generation defines 
> sustainability. "We think about how businesses 
> attract and retain employees, governance, 
> branding; how they operate in the community; and 
> how all of that drives their business strategy," 
> Blood explains. "We have a belief that explicit 
> recognition of environmental, social, governance, 
> economic, and ethical factors affect business." 
> Generation's research team, led by Colin le Duc, 
> has both environmental economists and traditional 
> buy-side equity analysts, who have learned to ask 
> a wider range of questions of the companies they 
> cover. The firm plans to build a long-term 
> portfolio of only 30 to 50 companies. Blood 
> claims that returns so far have exceeded 
> expectations, although he won't divulge 
> specifics. (See "An Inconvenient Portfolio" for some of the 
> firm's holdings.)
> 
> The firm now has nearly $1 billion under 
> management, from 15 institutions, plus a few 
> individuals. And it has turned down some 
> investors. Says Blood: "Anybody who is expecting 
> a monthly report on how their stocks are doing isn't for us."
> 
> A few million people saw An Inconvenient Truth," 
> says Kevin Wall. "I plan to deliver 2 billion 
> eyeballs." Wall is the producer of this summer's 
> Live Earth concerts--nine simultaneous events 
> across seven continents on July 7, on the model 
> of Live 8, to raise awareness for global warming 
> and money for the Alliance for Climate 
> Protection, a nonpartisan advocacy group of which 
> Gore is chairman. "The artists are not being 
> paid, I'm not being paid," Wall notes.
> 
> His biggest unpaid superstar is Gore himself. On 
> the night of the Grammys this year, Gore went 
> from dressing room to dressing room backstage, 
> recruiting performers. He was in the midst of 
> lobbying the Red Hot Chili Peppers when he was 
> called to the stage to present the award for best 
> rock album--to the Red Hot Chili Peppers. When 
> the group came out to accept the award, they told Gore they'd 
> do the concert.
> 
> Live Earth was inspired, Wall says, by An 
> Inconvenient Truth. After he saw the film at its 
> premiere, he talked to NBC Universal chief Jeff 
> Zucker about broadcasting the concerts across the 
> NBC properties and lined up the BBC and MSN as 
> partners, then reached out to Gore. "I told Al, 
> 'I don't need anything from you, I just want to hand you the mike.'"
> 
> That Gore now finds himself the celebrity draw is 
> ironic, given that his star "performance" 
> revolves around a slideshow. When Laurie David 
> and the documentary team she'd 
> assembled--director Davis Guggenheim, producer 
> Lawrence Bender (of the Kill Bill movies), 
> producer Scott Burns (famous for the "Got Milk?" 
> ads), and coproducer Lesley Chilcott--went to San 
> Francisco to lobby Gore about making a movie, he 
> was reluctant. His global-warming spiel was just 
> a lecture, he said. How would it work as a film?
> 
> He relented, though--in part because he was so 
> passionate about the slide show. Working first 
> with flip charts and a slide carousel, and now 
> with Apple's Keynote software, Gore found he 
> could talk to people in his own voice, without 
> the handlers, image consultants, and 
> intermediaries that turned him into a 
> sound-bitten, earth-toned version of himself in 
> 2000. Gore was happy to continue traveling the 
> country with his slides, but David had a more 
> aggressive agenda: "Let's get it out there!"
> 
> The production schedule for An Inconvenient Truth 
> was so compressed that Gore joked it was like 
> making "Kill Al, Vol. Three," a friendly jibe at 
> Bender. Filming began in July 2005; the premiere 
> was at Sundance the following January. In 
> between, Katrina hit. "I was scheduled to give 
> the slide show in New Orleans that day," Gore 
> says. "The audience was the state insurance 
> commissioners who wanted to learn more about hurricanes and 
> global warming."
> 
> The movie was released theatrically in New York 
> and Los Angeles in May 2006, in wide release in 
> June. And by March 2007, Gore was thanking the 
> Academy. Part of the proceeds from the film go to 
> the Alliance for Climate Protection. The film has 
> made more than $50 million worldwide; 50,000 DVDs 
> have been given away to schools and nonprofits, 
> and 850,000 copies of the book have been sold.
> 
> Back in New York, I ask Gore to explain what he 
> meant when he said he wanted Current TV to be 
> transformational. He answers with a 10-minute 
> history lesson on the computer. "It's a geeky 
> analogy, but you're from Fast Company, so you'll 
> like it," he says good-naturedly. Sketching a 
> diagram on a file folder, he reveals just how 
> geeky he is himself. He certainly needs more than 
> 30 seconds to get his point across.
> 
> That helps explain why, despite the interest from 
> so many Democrats in his political aspirations, 
> he seems genuinely distanced from the idea of 
> running for President--at least for now. "What 
> politics has become," Gore explains at one point 
> during our discussion, "is something that 
> requires a kind of tolerance for artifice and 
> manipulative communications strategies that I 
> just find I have in very short supply. I just 
> don't have the patience for things that seem to 
> be greatly rewarded in today's political system."
> 
>      Politically, his outsider status makes him a potential kingmaker.
> 
> If this is sour grapes over 2000, it doesn't 
> sound like it--at least not from the vantage 
> point of 2007. "A politics of ideas, driven by 
> passion, seems to encounter a headwind," he tells 
> me. "I do think that the Internet is bringing 
> revolutionary transformation. I have not ruled 
> out the possibility of getting into politics 
> sometime in the future," he says, "but I don't 
> expect to. Because I don't expect things to 
> change. If they did change, then I would feel differently."
> 
> As a political figure, Gore may be more palatable 
> as a possible dark horse than an actual 
> candidate--precisely because he seems incapable 
> of turning his passions into sound bites. And in 
> any campaign, he might find himself on the 
> defensive for his business activities. In his 
> slideshow tour, he has been paid by many 
> companies, which could be used to challenge his 
> integrity. (He routinely cuts or eliminates his 
> fee for schools and other nonprofits.) He also 
> headed the Apple board committee that cleared 
> Steve Jobs of wrongdoing in the stock-options backdating scandal.
> 
> Sitting where he is, his outsider status makes 
> him a potential kingmaker among the Democratic 
> candidates. He has said he expects to endorse 
> someone eventually. Whoever gets the nod can 
> expect Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection to 
> run its own campaign on the issues.
> 
> Gore sees no reason to apologize for not wanting 
> to jump into the electoral fray. As a 
> businessman, he can speak with a candor few 
> successful politicians can maintain. He has made 
> an enormous amount of money and achieved 
> positions of influence from technology to 
> financial services to media. He and Tipper are 
> even setting themselves up as angel investors for 
> a few early-stage tech companies they believe in. 
> In doing one end run after another around the 
> status quo, he has created a new life: a perfect 
> amalgam of environmental activism and a new type 
> of capitalism in which there is more than one 
> bottom line to consider, more than one master to serve.
> 
> Feedback: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -- 
> ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
> 
> 


Reply via email to