On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 09:13:31AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > And another one (one of the banned ones) was a woman with a massive > cleavage and deeply low cut blouse washing clothes at a riverbank.. and > looks like she's having an orgasm every minute that she's washing a pair > of underpants.
that is the amul underwear ad [1]; far less explicit than much other stuff on indian tv, so presumably it was the notion that a traditionally dressed indian woman could fantasise was deemed offensive. according to some blogger [2] amul is a "major brand in the Rs 5162 crore Indian innerwear market" but has apparently not had a trademark fight with the (i thought) much better known amul dairy brand. 1. http://youtube.com/watch?v=8zwOEdkxFuQ 2. http://marketingpractice.blogspot.com/2007/06/amul-innerwear-crafted-for-fantasies.html
