this is true, but it is not really effective. (if cloudmark can stop
_my_ spam, it can certainly help the spooks filter spam out during
traffic analysis). also, for this to work, you need to have more
outgoing mail, and include spam in your real mail. perhaps the inverse
to much spam, which includes legitimate sounding text (such as news
clippings) below the spam itself - we should all include spammy stuff in
footers to our legit mail?

of course, this would make life for many spam filters harder...

-rishab

On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 10:14 +0530, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
> >I don't get spam, I get cover traffic.
> >I've used the same email address since 1992.
> >
> >Tracking and analyzing my data flows (and storage) would be an 
> >expensive proposition.



Reply via email to