At 2007-10-05 09:04:40 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Because the tyranny of the masses is still a tyranny. > > Where did tyranny come into the picture? [...] > Not "allow" was used in the sense of using public outcry to make a > person stop.
Oh, you mean those genteel demonstrations of disagreement that one reads about when someone insults Shivaji or publishes cartoons about Muhammad or makes a film about Hindu widows in Varanasi? -- ams
