On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:19 PM, Gautam John wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 8:20 AM, Lawnun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'm not entirely sure about your second statement re: corporate personhood
being the basis of business

I'd imagined that the separation of individual liability from that of
the company was *the* reason it became, IMHO, the basis of business,
so to speak.


Corporate structures are a legal convenience that becomes necessary as a practical matter when business structures become large enough that it would be nearly impossible to adjudicate responsibility for actions in a tort when said responsibility is literally distributed among many thousands of individuals. There are benefits for individuals in both directions. The low-ranking employee is not personally liable for failures largely beyond their control, and other people have an entity to sue where the potential return justifies the overhead cost of the lawsuit.

The officers of a corporation are still personally liable for the most part in many countries, which is one of the reasons they are compensated so highly as dealing with random lawsuits -- frivolous or not -- is part of their job.


There are a couple well-known exceptions. The American insurance and financial services giant USAA is organized under an archaic and obscure Texas cooperative structure that not only did not operate as a corporation but where the *customers* of USAA were individually liable for lawsuits against USAA. Texas changed the law a few years back to protect the customers in this structure; USAA is routinely rated as the best insurance company in the US by many metrics, but I think the customers would have been shocked to discover that under the archaic Texas laws it was formed under they could be held personally liable to cover lawsuits against the entity.

So to answer the question corporations make large-scale business practical from a legal standpoint. Treating an organization with 100,000 employees as a group of 100,000 individuals for all external legal situations is problematic. A few centuries ago business was not of a scale where this mattered generally.

Cheers,

J. Andrew Rogers


Reply via email to