Hi,

Udhay nicely pointed out my intentions.

ss wrote:
Surely a dramatic intrusion with a deliberate confusion of identity is unnecessary and implies a childish prank at best.
right. But there is sometimes a difference between necessity and what I'm doing. Sometimes it happens that I do unnecessary things (like answering to this thread at all), and sometimes I even behave like a child (which gets lost more and more and I really feel bad about it). Obviously we are different in this way.

ss wrote:
Saying that it can be done, and demonstrating that it can be done on this list and writing a short essay about its feasibility and uses does not seem to serve any purpose. And I believe that if it was not meant as humor, there is probably some unstated purpose for doing it. I could speculate, but I won't.
You don't need to speculate, you can ask me. And, please read this email again, I feel bad if somebody interprets my work (which took me a while to formulate) as an essay about the feasibility of changing an email senders address. I'm surely able to write something like this, but the 'essay' tackled a different issue and described the purpose of using a different email id as far as possible at the beginning:

rene wrote:
> I am Rene ... How can you know? You have to trust me.

va created the imagination, that at/around Dinesh there is a bunch of people which mixup there identities. I pointed out that 1) there is no indication of that, only mistrust in those people who claimed to write an email. But using a defined email-address is no way to create trust, as the demonstration was able to show. 2) this skepticism about the identities behind any email is created by the fear that somebody breaks the defined borders of LCIN, which are, as I pointed out, not well defined and create mistrust and fear adapting them on the net. 3) the play with identities is something which is nothing to be afraid of if you like to change the role of woman/men in our/your society.

Hope that not too many of the readers missed those issues,
Regards,
Rene

Reply via email to