On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Sumant Srivathsan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That would be rejected. Or art. Definitely not advertising.
Aren't fashion magazines part art, part advertising, the ultimate informercials? The question remains, would it be offensive? I think the difference between what I described and the Vogue shoot is only subtle. It's one thing when you drag in a starlet who knows she's wearing designer wear, regardless of whether she's paid enough to make wearing them a habit. And it's quite another when you parade poor village folk in global haute-couture when they have no idea they are wearing a bib that costs more than their life's earnings. Cheeni
