On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Bonobashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> --- On Sun, 16/11/08, Chandrachoodan Gopalakrishnan <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, seriously though, here's what I'd like to do.
> >
> > 1) Really study history - not make jabs at it.
> > 2) Learn three languages - one European, one Asian and one
> > Indic
> > 3) Do the east coast of India bike trip. (I've done
> > about a third of the TN
> > coast, though not on one trip)
> > 4) Go from Madras to London on the bike
> > 5) Sleep
> > 6) Learn to decipher old tamil/grantha/brahmi scripts. Work
> > with the
> > Epigraphical society/ASI in TN
> > 7) At least make a list of books that I have not read
> >
> >
> > C
>
>
> Do you want to know a lot about history - and that's vague enough as it is
> - or do you want to be an historian? Those are two hugely different
> categories and states of being.
>

I don't want to be a historian. My interest in history is purely arm-chair
and perhaps to impress the odd friend with knowledge about cultures. I do
have a fairly good idea of south Indian/Tamil empires and would like to
build on it.


>
> Regarding your list of books, what books? Fiction, non-fiction, academic,
> belles-lettres....Unless you're reasonably sure what you want to read, how
> easy or difficult is it to make a list?
>

Um, that was mentioned half in jest. I buy books based on how I feel for
that month/quarter - currently I am in a fiction/classics phase.  Three
months ago it was graphic novels. Making a list is not very difficult, but I
prefer to not make one.


> Just a silly, very silly example: Just taking up the influence of Gramsci
> on latter-day Marxism and how it seagues off into Derrida and deconstruction
> as a literary and philosophical tool, and the links with subaltern studies,
> could take a lifetime in itself. So would a sociological and historical
> analysis of Georgette Heyer. Or one could just curl up with a good book and
> to the devil with the serious stuff.
>

:))


>
> My humble tuppence, which may be worth less, is that one needs to focus
> fiercely to get anything intellectually or academically useful done within a
> single lifetime. And it usually doesn't work even then.
>
> Did you read history in college by any chance?
>

Nope.  Studied accountancy, business communication, economics. And received
a totally worthless paper at the end of it.

C

-- 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ravages
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ravages
http://www.selectiveamnesia.org/

+91-9884467463

Reply via email to