On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Rishab Aiyer Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 12:33 +0530, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote: >> http://www.thehindu.com/thehindu/mag/2008/11/30/stories/2008113050060300.htm > > i will not blame harsh mander but does the hindu no longer have a copy > desk??
I'm not sure I understand what that means. >> Shyamlal and Lalita Tandi hit the headlines when it was 'exposed' that they > [...] >> sold their daughter. Latika tried to explain, but they did not seem to > > regarding the content, while it the sold child might have indeed had a > greater chance of living under the care of the buyer, i imagine that > it'd be pretty common for the buyer _not_ to be one who "loved the > three-year-old like his own daughter". Yes, but the "system" should have a soul and the ability to discern. Applying the rule book with eyes closed isn't helping anyone, least of all in domestic affairs such as this. Cheeni P.S. As another example of the wrong kind of blind justice, I never really grasped the need to convict someone for attempted suicide.
