On Tuesday 24 Mar 2009 11:12:07 am Bonobashi wrote: > The article itself is tendentious; Christian contributions bad and meant > for perverted priests and houses of worship where the innocent are > converted, Muslim contributions go to buy bullets and bandannas, Hindu > contributions are not Hindu contributions, they are morally committed > individuals doing their humble bit for the upliftment of Mother India. This > has never been stated in so many words, but the examples speak for > themselves. The individual author responsible also needs to be known and > identified in his political context for the article to make full sense.
This is the point. NGOs in general are being seen as agents of the dying Church in the West seeking to harvest souls in India. Incredulity and contempt are the usual reactions to this - but remember that incredulity and contempt did nothing to either Osammy or Dubya - who both carried on with what they felt they had to do. There is a wide ad spreading feeling that NGOs are a front for both evangeilsm and jihad. Only one NGO needs to be shown to have even a remote conenction with such activities to tar the whole bunch. This is a very real thing - as real as the Ram Sene and Varun Gandhi. What will start happening is physical attacks against NGO.s If they use jeeps - guess what will burn first? Exactly what can be done about this - other than sarcasm and contempt? shiv
