2009/6/2 Lahar Appaiah <[email protected]> > Risky to whom, exactly? To the people working there (because of high crime > rates, etc) or to the company outsourcing, because of the fear of the > office > shutting down or not having adequate staff, and therefore having their > operations impacted?
The latter of course. > > If it's the former, why is it 'riskiest to offshore to'? Why can't it be > riskiest to work in? > > And picking on Bangalore specifically- while uncontrolled environmental > waste and pollution is not a nice thing, how does that make a place any > riskier? Unless they're talking a Bhopal style disaster? Beats me. For a more indepth look, their methodology for the 2009 report[1] is a downloadable PDF. http://theblackbookofoutsourcing.com/visitor-signin.aspx?inter=2009SurveyMethodology Kiran
