On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Udhay Shankar N <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am I making sense?
>
> Udhay



On this list, that's really leading with your chin, Vod ka Raja!

While talking about members posting under pseudonyms, I would also like to
raise the issue of how many members ARE on this list. It's just my
preference, I suppose, but on all egroups that I moderate, I generally
update, and regularly circulate, the list of members; sometimes with just
their email ids and contact nos, or with a more "social" list, their postal
addresses and names of family members too. This certainly (to my mind)
increases the feeling of "community".

I actually joined one egroup which consists entirely of psuedonyms (ok, ok,
it's the Wodehouse egroup) and gave up as I found I had NO clue as to what
their real identities were. I didn't really appreciate talking to Psmith or
the Empress of Blandings without knowing them at all! On LJ, where I post,
too, I have got to know almost my entire "friends" circle by their actual
names and identities, even if I may not refer to them that way on the blog.

Very often, I desist from making a comment (no cheering allowed)  because I
wonder if it will be relevant to the whole mailing list, which ought to be
the case (I can't abide  A telling B on the egroup that just the two of them
can meet at C location!)...on this list, I have absolutely no idea of who
many of the members (except for some celebrities and some regular posters)
are....it's like being in a water body with no idea of its depth, somehow.
That doesn't prevent me from opening my big mouth wide and often, of course,
but...just saying....

I am not an archive-miner either; so I tend to participate in the present
threads, and I lack U's prodigious memory for threads, opinions, and ee tee
cee....so if anyone would like to introduce or re-introduce themselves, that
*would* be a big plus for me.

Anyone else who shares this opinion? Or do people *like* the way other
personalities remain anonymous? If that were the case, why are FoU meets
popular?

Cheers, Deepa.

Reply via email to