On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:07 PM, . <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I thought so too but could you elaborate on this. Suppose Justice A > has practiced (specialized if you must) criminal law for years, would > he sit in on the trial case for forgery, company embezzlement and > fraud? For Ex. the Satyam case - would that be heard in a special > court for Company affairs or by Justice A?
The main focus of your question is the use of the words "trial case" in the third sentence of this para cited above. I suspect that you would like to see an OJ style trial in India. Not happening for a while. Since I work on the appellate side, I am not aware with certainty. I will get back to you soon on this. > > > -- > . > >
