----- Original Message ---- From: ss <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, 28 January, 2010 7:02:36 Subject: Re: [silk] admin note on silklist postings On Wednesday 27 Jan 2010 9:57:18 pm Sirtaj Singh Kang wrote: > Just kidding of course. I went to visit my namesake recently for the first > time since I was an infant and I wasn't terribly impressed. I can see the > appeal, sure, but it doesn't really do much, The thing is its size. The photos don't tell you how huge it is. shiv NOW I'm confused. Were you continuing your last mail before this one, Shiv?
- [silk] admin note on silklist postings Udhay Shankar N
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist postings ss
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist postings Amit Varma
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist postings Sirtaj Singh Kang
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist posti... Anil Kumar
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist posti... ss
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist p... Radhika, Y.
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist p... Indrajit Gupta
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist p... Sirtaj Singh Kang
- Re: [silk] admin note on silkl... ss
- Re: [silk] admin note on s... Charles Haynes
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist postings Indrajit Gupta
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist postings Udhay Shankar N
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist posti... Udhay Shankar N
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist p... Ramakrishnan Sundaram
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist p... Indrajit Gupta
- Re: [silk] admin note on silklist posti... Ramakrishnan Sundaram
