-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Silklisters, What do you folks generally prefer: PGP/MIME or inline PGP? My observations are that usage of PGP/MIME makes it more difficult to locate messages with attachments in clients that don't grok it (or most webmail), inline PGP, otoh, becomes a distraction for everybody. I've had many a "fail" sending PGP/MIME mails to folks who still use Outlook Express. Also, PGP/MIME can sometimes get screwed up badly-configured mailing lists (which, for that matter, can even fail to respect inline PGP at times).
Is there a general rule of thumb that you've set for yourself as to when you use one or the other? I'm currently experimenting with inline PGP with my Gmail account, instead of PGP/MIME. My pubkey, for those interested: http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEC9A12051D5C5F07 Cheers, Pranesh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvjFjQACgkQ7JoSBR1cXwdA4wCeKFkkHOQK9Uo2Tie3rnS8xoJT lAsAn2gF09xsyg7HExM4tAnVbb1pYMK9 =oAG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
