I wonder what the EROEI on this is.

Udhay

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/61141/title/The_incredible_shrinking_solar_cell

The incredible shrinking solar cell
With lilliputian collectors, almost anything could be sun-powered
By Janet Raloff
July 31st, 2010; Vol.178 #3 (p. 28)

The next generation of solar cells will be small. About the size of
lint. But the anticipated impact: That’s huge.

Some of these emerging electricity-generating cells could be embedded in
windows without obscuring the view. Engineers envision incorporating
slightly larger ones into resins that would be molded onto the tops of
cars or maybe the roofs of buildings. One team of materials scientists
is developing microcells that could be rubber-stamped by the millions
onto a yard of fabric. When such cells shrink in size — but not
efficiency — it becomes hard to imagine what they couldn’t electrify.

“The idea is to develop ubiquitous solar power,” says Greg Nielson of
Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque. Foldable and moldable
modules crammed full of photovoltaic cells could directly power devices
or recharge batteries. “You can imagine putting them onto every
surface,” he says. “Your cell phone, laptop, backpack, tent — whatever.”

The U.S. Department of Energy is funding more than a dozen labs to
investigate photovoltaic physics “at the nanoscale,” notes Linda Horton,
who works in the agency’s Office of Science in Washington, D.C. “Our
goal,” she says, “is to understand and improve at a very fundamental
level the process by which energy from sunlight is translated into
electrical energy.”

Concentrate on this

The real trick to creating useful and affordable lilliputian solar cells
is not just shrinking their overall size, but cutting the amount of
silicon (or another costly semiconductor) that is needed for them to
deliver a watt of power.

Most photovoltaic devices today are crafted from rigid wafers of costly
silicon. At 20 micrometers thick, Sandia’s little cells are less than 10
percent as chunky as the ones used in conventional photo­voltaic
devices. “And because ours are not just thin, but small laterally, we
can do interesting tricks with them optically,” Nielson says. For
instance, his group has begun studding minute refractive lenses into
glass or plastic plates. Each lens concentrates sunlight onto a solar
cell, nearly as small as a pinpoint, that sits directly below.

Silicon is needed only at the focal point of each lens, further
diminishing the required quantity to about 1 percent of what’s needed
per unit of light-collecting area with commercial photovoltaics. “So
silicon is no longer the dominant cost, but a negligible one,” Nielson says.

His group grows thin, pure crystalline silicon, then etch-cuts each
wafer into a mass of separate hexagons anywhere from 250 micrometers to
10 millimeters in diameter. “We call them glitter,” says Sandia’s Murat
Okandan, and they do sparkle in hues ranging from gold and green to dark
purple. Each batch yields uniform and remarkably rugged cells. “We can
easily pick them up with a tweezers, and they don’t break,” the
electrical engineer says.

The Sandia program, which began in early 2008, is already turning out
proto­type cells with an energy conversion efficiency of about 15
percent. “And we anticipate getting over 20 percent,” Nielson says. That
wouldn’t be far from the best commercial solar cells today, which sport
efficiencies somewhat more than 25 percent, Okandan adds.

The small print

At the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, John Rogers works
with even thinner silicon — 10 to 15 micro­meters thick — because when
it’s slim enough it flexes like a strand of hair. Although he’s testing
silicon even thinner than that, the material presents special
challenges, he notes, “because even at 10 to 15 micro­meters the silicon
won’t absorb all of the incident light.” Much passes through.

By backing the cells with a reflective material, however, photons that
initially evaded the silicon will bounce back for a second chance at
collection. “We found that 15 micrometers is just about the right
thickness for that kind of double-pass configuration,” Rogers says. “It
will collect about 90 percent of the light.” And the efficiency of these
cells is already good, he says, on the order of 12 percent.

The Illinois microcells also rely on concentrators to focus sunlight.
Another key to keeping cell costs low, Rogers contends, will be avoiding
a need to “pick and place” each cell individually within a module of
perhaps legions of others, which is what the integrated circuit industry
does today. In the February Energy & Environmental Science, Rogers’ team
describes a way to simultaneously lift and transfer thousands of microcells.

After building a block of pure crystalline silicon, the researchers etch
out thousands of tiny cells from its surface by cutting around the sides
of each one and even underneath. After the etching process is finished,
the only thing holding the cells to the starting silicon are tiny
anchors of material left at either end of each cell.

The scientists then place a soft piece of slightly tacky rubber onto the
batch of cells and press down just hard enough to fracture the anchors.
When they lift this rubber pad up, the freed cells come with it.

“We can lift up thousands of these cells at a time and then simply
rubber-stamp them down onto a surface” coated with a thin-film adhesive,
Rogers says. “Our throughputs correspond to millions of devices per hour
— much, much higher than can be achieved with even the most
sophisticated tools for doing that [by] pick-and-place.”

Sparse pile

Caltech scientists have upended the silicon elements in their microcells
and jettisoned the concentrator. In the April Nature Materials, the team
describes a prototype that resembles a sparse carpet of tiny fibers that
stretch up toward the light. In the latest designs the fibers are 100
micrometers long and 1 or 2 percent as wide.

Some photons entering the carpet will immediately hit a semi­conductor
fiber. Many more will miss the wires, which cover only 1 to 5 percent of
the carpet’s footprint. But by making the wires effectively long and the
carpet’s bottom reflective, photons not initially collected will
ricochet repeatedly within the carpet until the silicon collects most of
them, explains team leader Harry Atwater.

To protect and hold the fibers, the Caltech scientists pour a liquid
akin to clear bathroom caulk (a polymer that solidifies into a pliable
plastic) to fill space separating the carpet’s sparse pile.

“We can now peel this composite array of wires and polymer off the
starting substrate just as if it were a piece of Scotch tape,” Atwater
says. The solar cell — this wire-studded polymer — “has the mechanical
properties of a plastic bag,” he notes. “So you can roll it or bend it
and the wires won’t break.”

By maximizing photon ricochets within the carpet, the applied physicist
explains, “you’re getting the same light absorption as you would from a
sheet that’s 100 percent silicon,” but using only 1 percent as much of
the pricey material.

Unlike systems that rely on concentrators, which don’t work well on
cloudy days, “this kind of cell has equally good absorption for light
entering at oblique angles — like when the sun is low in the sky or when
light is scattered by clouds.”

Prospects

Although none of the emerging designs are quite ready for prime time,
several groups think that products based on their innovations could
enter the marketplace in as little as three to five years.

“Right now the solar industry is kind of in a race to bring costs down
to $1 per watt,” Nielson says. “From our cost models, it looks like we
can get well below that with high-volume production.” But that’s a ways
off, he concedes, since his team has only just begun networking
individual glitter cells to make coordinated modules.

Atwater has conducted all of his experiments with silicon carpets a few
square centimeters in size. “The technology looks promising,” he says,
“but you have to ask: Will everything translate when you scale up to
very large areas?


-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))


Reply via email to