Nomination for the ignobel!

'Naresh' Narasimhan
Sent from my Phone

On 31-Aug-2010, at 13:32, Anish Mohammed <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 31 Aug 2010, at 02:16, Udhay Shankar N <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> This early in the morning, I can't tell if this is for real or not.
>> 
>> Udhay
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject:  A Mathematical Model of Sentimental Dynamics Accounting for
>> Marital Dissolution
>> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:12:44 -0700
>> From: <redacted>
>> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
>> 
>> A Mathematical Model of Sentimental Dynamics Accounting for Marital
>> Dissolution
>> 
>> Marital dissolution is ubiquitous in western societies. It poses major
>> scientific and sociological problems both in theoretical and therapeutic
>> terms. Scholars and therapists agree on the existence of a sort of *second
>> law of thermodynamics for sentimental relationships*. Effort is required to
>> sustain them. Love is not enough.
>> 
>> Building on a simple version of the second law we use optimal control theory
>> as a novel approach to model sentimental dynamics. Our analysis is
>> consistent with sociological data. We show that, when both partners have
>> similar emotional attributes, there is an optimal effort policy yielding a
>> durable happy union. This policy is prey to structural destabilization
>> resulting from a combination of two factors: there is an effort gap because
>> the optimal policy always entails discomfort and there is a tendency to
>> lower effort to non-sustaining levels due to the instability of the
>> dynamics.
>> 
>> These mathematical facts implied by the model unveil an underlying mechanism
>> that may explain couple disruption in real scenarios. Within this framework
>> the apparent paradox that a union consistently planned to last forever will
>> probably break up is explained as a mechanistic consequence of the second
>> law.
>> 
>> Marital dissolution is ubiquitous in western societies. It poses major
>> scientific and sociological problems both in theoretical and therapeutic
>> terms. Scholars and therapists agree on the existence of a sort of *second
>> law of thermodynamics for sentimental relationships*. Effort is required to
>> sustain them. Love is not enough.
>> Methodology/Principal Findings
>> 
>> Building on a simple version of the second law we use optimal control theory
>> as a novel approach to model sentimental dynamics. Our analysis is
>> consistent with sociological data. We show that, when both partners have
>> similar emotional attributes, there is an optimal effort policy yielding a
>> durable happy union. This policy is prey to structural destabilization
>> resulting from a combination of two factors: there is an effort gap because
>> the optimal policy always entails discomfort and there is a tendency to
>> lower effort to non-sustaining levels due to the instability of the
>> dynamics.
>> Conclusions/Significance
>> 
>> These mathematical facts implied by the model unveil an underlying mechanism
>> that may explain couple disruption in real scenarios. Within this framework
>> the apparent paradox that a union consistently planned to last forever will
>> probably break up is explained as a mechanistic consequence of the second
>> law.
>> *A "must read":
>> http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0009881*
>> 
> Hi udhay,
> The URL doesn't seem to work :(
> Anish

Reply via email to