On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:56 PM, <supriya.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > If a lay reader's criticism of a theorist's language is legitimate, is a > layperson equally right to criticise technical language in a scientific > discussion that her education has not equipped her to follow, as obtuse?
I'm not alone in calling her language obtuse - her fellow post-modernists (I don't think it's very nice to take a commonly understood term like "modern" and overlay it with a specific technical meaning, I hate this about Agile programmers too, who I usually abhor, but that's for another thread) claim she's nuts too. Cheeni
