On 12/22/10 10:36 PM December 22, 2010, Lawnun wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Nikhil Mehra
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
You know this just might be an Indian speaking, but I seriously
want you very privileged American bastards (and I was till
recently one of them by sheer virtue of having lived there) to
truly fearfully deal with "terror cynicism or theatre", to know
Schneier's article is everything but fantasy. So, he suggests
tough access. Fuck you!
...
Counselor --
In general, if you're trying to advance your argument, it might be
worthwhile to stick to a position, articulate that position clearly
and with then move on. As it stands, can neither tell whether you
think we're better off closing the monument, leaving it open, or using
it as a sexual aid.
Just saying.
Carey (an American who neither supports any of this, nor quite gets
the need for all the vitriol)
~
Oh, come on, Carey, be broad-minded here. If someone wants to use the
Washington Monument as a sexual aid, it should be fine as long as they
put the video on youtube under a NSFW tag.
[I was puzzled for a long time by the acronym SLYT, which certainly
sounds like it ought to be dirty but in fact stands for Single Link
YouTube.]
--
Heather Madrone ([email protected]) http://www.madrone.com
http://www.sunsplinter.blogspot.com
I'd love to change the world, but they won't give me access to the source code.
