--- On Wed, 12/1/11, Supriya Nair <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Supriya Nair <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [silk] The republic of fear
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 12 January, 2011, 11:05



On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Ramakrishnan Sundaram <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>> Will there be a day when an Indian will be

faced with mortal danger from a young hardliner because he is

considered 'anti-national?'


I know this column is pegged to the Taseer murder, but surely Indians should 
have learned the answer to this question on or around January 30, 1948. 


Supriya

Apart from the shock value of that statement, do you see no difference? 
Gandhi's profile and value to the One-Nation Theory preaching Congress was 
enormous, gigantic. His murder could have been seen, morality and ethics aside, 
as the destruction of the major engine of the Congress' political authority and 
power, a permanent block to its hopes of continuing as a functioning 
organisation. The murder of 7 people by the CPM harmad in Lalgarh is 
essentially different, just as the murder of the Jadavpur University 
ViceChancellor in the 70s was different: those were all ordinary people of no 
iconic value, people who would have made marginal differences in politics. It 
is when a tailor get knifed for stating a political belief in a tea-shop 
conversation that democracy comes to a grinding halt, not, shocking though it 
may seem at first blush.






Reply via email to