More from the same author
http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2009/04/aatish-salmaan-taseer-punjab-
pakistan/

>“In Pakistan, the clothes people wear are much better. There’s far less
> poverty. India makes its own things, its own cars, but then you don’t get
> Land Cruisers. In India, you get Indian needles. In Pakistan, we get
> Japanese needles!”
>
>In India you now got Japanese needles too. The lieutenant had visited before
> economic liberalisation, but that was not the point. What struck me was how
> this man, who would never come close to owning a Land Cruiser, could talk
> of such things as core human differences. The poverty around him was as bad
> as anything I had ever seen, yet he spoke of expensive cars. It was as if
> the mere fact of difference was what he needed. It hardly mattered what the
> differences meant: that was taken care of by the inbuilt rejection of
> India. In the confusion about what Pakistan was meant to be—a secular state
> for Indian Muslims, a religious state, a military dictatorship, a
> fiefdom—the rejection of India could become more powerful than the
> assertion of Pakistan.

<snip>

>“The other difference,” he began, “was that while men here wear flat
> colours, the men there are fond of floral prints, ladies’ clothes.” Hindus
> weaker, more feminine, and Muslims stronger, manlier: this was the dull
> little heart of what the lieutenant wanted to say and a great satisfaction
> came over his face as he spoke. This was the way he reconnected with the
> glories of the Islamic past when the martial Muslims ruled the “devious
> Hindu.”

<snip>

>Pakistan’s economic advantage, the manliness of Muslim men, Land Cruisers
> and Japanese needles, even an imagined better climate: these were the
> small, daily manifestations that nourished a greater rejection of India,
> making the idea of Pakistan robust and the lieutenant’s migration
> worthwhile.

Reply via email to