Book: http://www.amazon.com/Foreigner-Carrying-Crook-Tiny-Bomb/dp/0822345781

http://www.iexaminer.org/arts/non-fiction-foreigner-carrying/

A Foreigner Carrying … a Tiny Bomb
By Nalini Iyer

Nalini Iyer is Associate Professor of English at Seattle University
where she specializes in Postcolonial Studies with an emphasis on
South Asia. She has written numerous scholarly articles and book
reviews on South Asian literature and her upcoming book, co-edited
with Bonnie Zare is Other Tongues: Rethinking the Language Debates in
India (Rodopi, 2008).

Author Amitava Kumar.

Part investigative journalism and part political commentary, Amitava
Kumar’s latest book “A Foreigner Carrying in the Crook of His Arm a
Tiny Bomb,” is a thought-provoking, incisive, and intelligent look at
America’s war on terror and its linkages to terrorism in India. As two
of the world’s largest democracies, both the United States and India
aggressively pursue individuals and organizations they see as real or
imagined threats to national security. Both nations have endured
horrendous attacks from jihadists — September 11 in the United States
and the attack on the Indian parliament and the terror attack in
Mumbai in November 2008 — that have served to justify and validate the
nation state’s policing of its borders and its methods of detention
and interrogation of suspected terrorists.

Kumar takes an interesting approach to his subject. He profiles two
South Asians, Hemant Lakhani and Shahawar Matin Siraj, who have been
indicted of conspiracy to commit terrorist acts. Siraj, a Pakistani
immigrant was indicted in a plot to bomb a New York subway station and
Lakhani, an Indian American, for conspiring to sell weapons to
al-Qaeda. Kumar carefully profiles these men not with the intent of
proving them innocent or dismantling the case against them but to
examine how these charges were developed against each man. Unlike the
popular media image of a terrorist master-mind, what emerges is the
portrait of two naïve, bungling men who were embroiled in a complex
conspiracy that neither seemed to have the wit and intelligence to
commit. Both men were indicted based on evidence developed through
police informants whose role involved active provocation of the
conspiracy. Even if Kumar had simply focused on these two men and
their stories, this book would have been an important one; however,
Kumar extends his discussion to analysis of terrorism investigation
and prosecution in India. His recounting of the story of Geelani, a
professor of Arabic, indicted of conspiring to attack the Indian
parliament is chilling. The description of the torture methods, the
violation of individual rights, and complete power of the surveillance
state raise questions about how far can a country go to protect
itself. What justifies Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and the treatment of
Kashmiris?

Kumar’s reportage is a compelling read; his portraits of different men
— Siraj, Lakhani, Geelani, Prakash — rendered with the deft hand of a
talented writer. He is careful to explore the many dimensions of each
case and to provide a nuanced and balanced picture. At the same time,
he levels a searing critique of the practices of nations that pride
themselves on their democratic principles. As he notes in his
conclusion, “The slow, calm procedure of law hides from us the
brutality of the state and the horror of war.” It leaves the reader
wondering, how much does a citizen really know about the brutality of
the nation state that claims to be guided by law? Reading Kumar’s book
is definitely a step in educating the citizenry.

Reply via email to