On Wednesday 25 Apr 2012 10:25:32 am Lahar Appaiah wrote:
> Does anyone have any thoughts on the fundamental basis of intelligence
> tests, i.e., are they biased towards the mathematically inclined, is it
> even possible to have a universal definition of human intelligence, does
> higher IQ really help, and so on.

I think IQ tests are a load of crock like a meauring tape to assess sexual 
ability.

I meet plenty of illiterate but smart people who would fail any IQ test by a 
huge margin.

Calling the parameter "Intelligence Quotient" was a coup in that it made 
sheeple associate intelligence with that test, just like "Religion of Peace" 
might make people associate peace with a religion. 

I think it is only lack of intelligence to irrevocably link IQ with 
intelligence except when used sarcastically or as a put down.


shiv



Reply via email to