Due process of law and free speech can coexist, bit she seems to think Microsoft and google are at fault here even for that.
--srs (HTC One X) ----- Reply message ----- From: "Charles Haynes" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: [silk] Fwd: Role of the US Tech Companies in G overnment Surveillance: A Lecture by Christoph er Sogho ian — Centre for Internet and Society Date: Sun, Aug 26, 2012 2:23 PM On Aug 26, 2012 9:06 AM, "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[email protected]> wrote: > The basic premise seems to be that cooperation with law enforcement by ISPs is a violation of its users' privacy and free speech. As a user I would prefer to use an ISP that divulged my personal information only when legally compelled, and actively resisted such compulsion on my behalf; requiring the government to establish that such cooperation was actually required. > I have had my share of arguments about this in the past and don't quite feel like repeating the lot, typing on a phone as I am How can there be any argument that I am entitled to select an ISP on whatever grounds I want? -- Charles
