On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:49:09PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Except that it has a sovereign guarantee backing it.
Busily destroying it, you mean. > Which may not matter as much if the country backing it is, say, Zimbabwe. > But you get the picture. No, I actually don't. All sovereigns default, in the long run.
