Because so many of us began out SFF journey with Asimov. And because
mortality is much on the mind of late.

Udhay

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2013/11/the_caves_of_steel_the_naked_sun_isaac_asimov_s_portrayal_of_radical_life.html

Asimov’s Laws of Longevity

The sci-fi legend on the downsides of living a long life.
By Konstantin Kakaes

Isaac Asimov Isaac Asimov, here in the 1970s, addressed in his robot
novels the implications of a very long life.


Isaac Asimov was the foremost science fiction writer of the second half
of the 20th century. He was notoriously prolific, churning out hundreds
of books. Late in life, he reflected: “I wanted to write fictional
history in which there are no true endings … in which, even when a
problem is apparently solved, a new one arises to take its place. To
this end, I sacrificed everything else.” Asimov’s style was that of the
pulps he came up in. His characters are, by his own admission, cutouts;
his prose is not subtle. But he was very good at what he set out to be
good at—positing technological solutions to societal problems and then
figuring out what new problems these solutions entailed.

His laws of robotics, a schema for virtuous automation, were one such
exploration. Because he explicitly wrote three laws, they were reified
in the canon of science fiction, a process helped along when Will Smith
probed their limits in a film adaptation. But Asimov was concerned not
only with robots, but also with the implications of longer human
lifespans. If we’re going to talk about the social and political
consequences of longer lives—as Future Tense is doing with a special
package—then we should listen to Asimov, who suggests longevity leads to
selfishness and stasis.

The murder mystery The Caves of Steel was Asimov's first big success as
a novelist. In the book, the victim is a roboticist from Aurora, the
first of 50 planets colonized by explorers from Earth (“Spacers”). The
first colonists were selected for their abilities and so were healthier
than average. Their ships were sterilized and so brought no diseases
with them. The Spacers have become a sort of galactic upper class, more
technologically advanced and military powerful than those left on the
overpopulated, resource-strained Earth. While Earthlings live to about
the same age we experience today, the Spacers expect much lengthier
lifespans.

The contrast is highlighted by Elijah Baley, a police detective on
Earth, and Hans Fastolfe, an Auroran politician who was a colleague of
the murder victim. Fastolfe expects to live to be between 300 and 350.
But he is wary of the drawbacks of such a long life. "If you were to die
now," he says to Baley, "you would lose perhaps forty years of your
life, probably less. If I were to die, I would lose a hundred fifty
years, probably more." Fastolfe goes on to sketch out for Baley the
mores of Auroran society. The birth rate is kept low, "Developing
children are carefully screened for physical and mental defects before
being allowed to mature," and humans constitute a sort of leisure class,
with all the labor done by robots.

Baley is horrified by all of this, but not for the same reasons as
Fastolfe, who is troubled by his society's stability. "It is possible to
be too stable," he says. In Auroran culture, "individual life is of
prime importance." Aurorans are, in his view, unable to collaborate with
one another, and too risk-averse, because of their longevity.

Asimov followed The Caves of Steel three years later with The Naked Sun,
in which Baley travels to Solaria, another Spacer world. Whereas Aurora
boasts 50 robots for every person, on Solaria, there are 10,000 for each
individual. On Solaria, there is a strong taboo against physical
contact, which is thought to be inherently dirty, and the 20,000
residents "view" one another by a sort of hologram-video-conferencing.
Solarians, even more than Aurorans, are devoted to individual comforts.
The Solarians, in their splendid isolation, have no police detectives.
This is why they call on Baley, from Earth—until the murder of the
story, they claim to have had no crime. "We on Solaria have no
experience with these things. In a way, we don't understand people.
There are too few of us here," a Solarian leader tells Baley. The
Solarians are individually wealthy and long-lived. But they do not
innovate or, really, love.

Baley returns to Earth and reports to his superiors: "When you ordered
me to Solaria, you asked a question; you asked what the weaknesses of
the Outer Worlds were. Their strengths were their robots, their low
population, their long lives, but what were their weaknesses?" Baley
pauses, before delivering his punch line: "Their weaknesses, sir, are
their robots, their low population, their long lives."

It took Asimov 30 years to complete his trilogy, with The Robots of
Dawn, published in 1983, which takes place on Aurora. Baley goes to
Aurora to solve the "murder" of a robot. On his trip there, he reads up
on the planet's history. As the Auroran lifespan grew longer over the
course of generations, he finds their history grows more and more
boring. As they live longer and longer lives, Aurorans do less and less.
A Solarian woman with whom he falls in love tells him, "[W] hen you live
several centuries, you have plenty of time to lose thousands of things.
Be th-thankful (sic) for short life."

In Greek myth, long life is portrayed as individually perilous. Mortals
are given immortality by way of punishment, as with Tantalus and
Sisyphus. As a favor to Eos, the goddess of the dawn (not coincidentally
known as Aurora in Roman mythology), Zeus bestows eternal life on her
lover Tithonus. Tithonus lives forever but ages cruelly, becoming weak
and senile. The same set of concerns underlies the various retellings of
the legend of Faust, as in Oscar Wilde’s Dorian Gray, in which the quest
for youth has perverse consequences at an individual level.

Asimov, though, is concerned not with the individual, but with the
macro-effects of long life, which he portrays as stultifying. Auroran
scientists "have three or three and a half centuries to devote to a
problem, so that the thought arises that significant progress may be
made in that time by a solitary worker. It becomes possible to feel a
kind of intellectual greed-to want to accomplish something on your own …
general advance is slowed on Spacer worlds as a result."

It’s easy to dismiss Asimov’s imaginings as unrealistic. Earth, in The
Caves of Steel, has a population of 8 billion, scarcely more than its
present population. The only way to grow enough food to support the
population is through giant vats of yeast—Asimov claims the population
is far too large for conventional agriculture to suffice. But much of
what he predicts resonates in small ways. Nobody now lives in the
isolation of a Solarian, and yet my office is filled with people who
prefer to send emails to one another instead of walking 10 seconds to
briefly converse. (I suspect this is not atypical.) The children of the
privileged are raised in structured, sheltered environments that have
more of a common feel with Asimov’s Aurora, filled with individualistic
strivers, than they do with the Earth of Caves, in which kids roughhouse
harmlessly, blowing off steam in a shinier version of the 1950s.

His books are useful antigens to Whiggish ideas of technological
progress. Earth will never become Aurora. But the tonier parts of
Silicon Valley are already starting to resemble it. Asimov viewed part
of the task of science fiction as accustoming readers to the idea of
change, to the knowledge that “things will be different,” and so to help
them plan for change with wisdom. Part of that wisdom is undertaking a
healthy skepticism of technological fixes to problems like aging.

-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))

Reply via email to