> On 05-Feb-2019, at 12:56, Srini RamaKrishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:22 PM Deepa Agashe <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> As I see it, scientific understanding means that we have greater >> repeatability than expected by chance- i.e. the signal to noise ratio is >> high. > > > So is the placebo effect science? It is greater than expected by chance, > isn't it? Yes, it is. And a very useful one, actually.
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Kiran K Karthikeyan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Kiran K Karthikeyan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Heather Madrone
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Charles Haynes
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Kiran K Karthikeyan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Heather Madrone
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Srini RamaKrishnan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Deepa Agashe
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Srini RamaKrishnan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Deepa Agashe
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Srini RamaKrishnan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Srini RamaKrishnan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Charles Haynes
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Kiran K Karthikeyan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Srini RamaKrishnan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Deepa Agashe
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Srini RamaKrishnan
- Re: [silk] War on Science? Deepa Agashe
