Scott wrote: > Let me just throw a word in about the "mild silver protein". > First, I have never used it, I don't need it, I have more colloidal > silver than I can use.
I've got as much as I could possibly want, as well! > Another thing, Bob Beck, one of the pioneers in the field electro > medical applications is adamantly opposed to the "mild silver > protein" products. He says they turn the skin gray. The only doubt I'd have of such a statement is how anyone could afford enough of the mild silver protien product to get agyria! I *believe* that they sell 30ppm preparations, charge between five and ten dollars per ounce, and talk about teaspoon sized dosages. (It's been awhile since I looked in at their site to find out what the prices were and look at their research.) The OSHA limits for silver exposure were in the neighborhood of several tenths of a gram, I think (again from memory). There are 30 milligrams of silver in a liter of 30ppm preparation. Calculate that out! It would take about eight 4 oz bottles of their stuff to make a liter. And at least ten liters to get into the range of the OSHA numbers. That would be *expensive*! Thousands of dollars. I suppose there *could* be some people desperate enough to have spent that much money on MSP to generate the condition Beck cites... > The entire concept of making larger particles (bonding silver with a > protein) seems to work against the principle of the effectiveness of > colloidal solutions. It is the ultra small particle size that is effective. Ultra small particles in a large, bioactive molecule. Hey! It may work! We don't know one way or the other. > In any case, IF the "mild silver protein" is indeed effective, we > are back to square one. Why pay great sums for something we can > make for almost nothing? Something that does not have the protein, > but is proven effective, time and time again. Even, apparently > curing Lyme in some of our members on this very list! *That* is the essential question. > Pushing "mild silver protein" (and that name is exclusively owned > by a single manufacturer, is it not?) is to promote commercial > products on the list. Am I incorrect? Please correct me if I am > wrong. Isn't that what the <silverbullet.com> address is all about? > Is this product sold through MLM?? Kirk, are you using the list to > sell your program/product/organizaton? Just curious. :) Scott, don't lower yourself to their kind of tactics. You impugn the integrity of *honest* Multi-Level-Marketers everywhere. (Not *all* MLM is dishonest or dishonorable, though certainly enough to deserve a bad reputation.) I don't recall their product being sold MLM. Some are. It doesnt matter. We're all paying the price for the degradation of colloidal silver's reputation as a result of unscrupulous claims and operations of a few. The real issue I think you're responding to (don't let me put words in your mouth!) is the repeated and rude attacks these people have made on all of their competition, including us, the do-it-yourself CS makers. > So, to those who are new to this list, please don't fall for those ads we > see about the expensive product called "mild silver protein". It may be > good, some claim it is, but there is no reason to anticipate it is any > better, or even as good, as that colloidal silver we so freely make on our > own kitchen countertops. :) > > I hope I am preaching to the choir about now. :) La-la-la-la-la! Do-re-mi... > God Bless, > > Scott Mike Devour [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [[email protected] ] [Speaking only for himself... ]
